🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where African descendants are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The tide has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the month is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how important it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A campaign to scrub African American heritage and legacy from the historical documents is in progress. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration illustrates how little it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the situation of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that face all if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.